Related topics

x64/x86 question.
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] andre...@hotmail.com microsoft public windows 64bit general microsoft public windows vista general Hi Jeff :) -- Andre Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta "Jeff" <S.Cereves...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in

Why Solaris x64 is x86?
Joseph Koshy joseph.ko...@gmail.com lucky freebsd amd64 This does not work also, matter afact, it completely ignores the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable like it doesnt exist. Check if a program is set[ug]id. Such programs ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH for security reasons. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6//lib/libqt-mt.so.3:

Cross platform project builds (x64 & x86)
Kris Kennaway k...@obsecurity.org lucky freebsd amd64 On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:40:30PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:38 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:59:49PM -0800, Kris Moore wrote: Figured I'd give you guys an update on this also. I got all the libraries loaded,

x86 VM on x64 Virtual Server
Bruce Chambers bchamb...@cable0ne.n3t microsoft public windows 64bit general PBENISTY wrote: Hi I would like to know if it is possible to install win2003 x64 and x86 on the same partition? thanks for you answer It may be possible, but it's *NEVER* a good idea to have two operating systems on the same partition;

single cat file for x86 and x64
Hello, using VC/C++ 8.0 to compile my WDM driver (mainly written in C++) I got the following link error (on x86 & x64). Compiling it with VC/C++ 7.1 linking works without problems. DrvEntry.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "const type_info::`vftable'" (??_7type_info@@6B@) The problem seems to be the

X64 and X86
EBFes for Win x64 will keep up with x86 when customer demand on the platform catches up. -- Reg Domaratzki, Sybase iAnywhere Solutions Sybase Certified Professional - Sybase ASA Developer Version 8 Please reply only to the newsgroup iAnywhere Developer Community : http://www.ianywhere.com/developer iAnywhere

x86 vs x64
COM comp unix solaris dutch disCo <dutchdisco@indaspace> writes: I've just registered and downloaded Solaris 10 for x64/x86 (as stated in the download section). However, the system indicates it runs in x86 (i386) mode although my box is AMD64 Athlon. What makes you think it run in x86 mode?

Link problem with VC/C++ 8.0 (Beta) on x86 & x64
Biz bu servera Team Foundation Server x86 kurmak istiyoruz ama http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/2228/adszuw1.jpg böyle bir ekranla karşılaşıyoruz.. Acaba Team Foundation Server 2005 i yalnış mı kuruyoruz yoksa x64 olan server 2003 ümüzünde X86 versiyonumu olmalı ???

WSS v3 x64 and SQL 2000 SP4 x86
"Frank" wrote: System Spec: AMD FX-62 OCZ 4GB Ram Windows XP x64 When opening Internet Explorer x86, it communicates with the given website but does not go as far as loading it. All direct connections under other programs work perfectly. It seems that it is only when a http/ftp.. request is made.

x86 won't install, x64 will.
Hen Savelkoul Hen.Savelk...@licom.nl novell support bordermanager vpn Thanks for the tip. I'm gonna try Lewis Rosenthal schreef: On 11/06/06 04:27 am, Hen Savelkoul thus wrote : Is there a Document that describes step by step how to implement certificate mode (So I can use the VPN client in vista) Regards,

Command line cross-compile X86, X64 and IA64 Visual Studio 2005
Gary R. Schmidt grschm...@acm.org comp unix solaris Amber wrote: Yes, x64 is the indication of 64-bit processors. I have installed it on a 32-bit machine, now I want to install in onto a 64-bit machine, which I can't touch now, can I use the same iso files to install? Yes. Cheers, Gary B-)

Command line cross-compile X86, X64 and IA64 Visual Studio 2005
Chuck Walbourn [MSFT] chu...@online.microsoft.com microsoft public win32 programmer directx sdk This is going to be true of all Microsoft Windows SDKs these days. x86 = 32-bit applications, the standard thing we've been using since the days of Windows 95/NT 3.5. x64 = 64-bit native applications, which can only be

X64 and X86
Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net comp unix solaris Pepe wrote: Richard B. Gilbert wrote: Amber wrote: On the offical download page for Solaris 10, there are only Solaris for SPARC and Solaris for x64/x86 links, does that mean the x64/x86 version can be installed on both 32bit and 64bit machines?

Command line cross-compile X86, X64 and IA64 Visual Studio 2005
As long as it's not kernel extensions (modules or drivers), and it's just user-space utilities, Solaris x64 is *designed* to run both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries on the same machine without trouble. In fact, most of the utilities that come with Solaris for x86/x64 architectures are still 32-bit because there's no

How to detect x86 or x64 of Windows XP?
Nick N...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista performance_maintenance I upgraded my Dimension 8400 to Vista x64 hoping it would take advantage of the 64 bit CPU I have... tough experience so far. I have as many 64 bit drivers as I found on the Dell site and the manufacturers.

Switching from x64 back to x86 with an upgrade pk
Bruce Chambers bchamb...@cable0ne.n3t microsoft public windows 64bit general Lin McDowell wrote: I have a computer which was built for me which has XP Pro x64 loaded. Forgive the stupid question, but in the C drive has two "Program Files" folders: one just says "Program Files", the other "Program Files (x86)".

Installing windows 2003 x64 and x86
michael mich...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public virtualserver Can I run my VMs (x86) created with VS2005R2 x86 on a new Server (x64) with VS2005R2 x64?

x64 x86 lib?
Carlos "mjs" wrote: Running on XP x64... Software I'm trying to install says it requires .NET Framework to work. Visiting Microsoft.com, I see that the latest version is 3, and that it is available in both x86 and x64 flavors. The software requiring it is 32 bits. Which of the x86 and x64 versions of .

X64 and X86
John D Groenveld groen...@cse.psu.edu alt solaris x86 In article <pan.2005.10.21.22.40.59.94...@ytc1NOARGEYSPAM.co.uk>, Bruce Porter <b...@ytc1NOARGEYSPAM.co.uk> wrote: Unfortunatly it was marketing thing at the last minute , so that pissed every one off. Microsoft's marketing wonks also chose to spew the "x64"

Running Vista x64 in Virtual PC on Vista x86
The managed c++ assembly has the ProcessorArchitecture correctly set to x86 (32 Bit). The application however does not have the 32Bit-Corflag set and is therefore loaded by the x64 version of the .net framework runtime (64 Bit). So when the application tries to load the Managed C++ assembly I get an exception,